Creat membership Creat membership
Sign in

Forgot password?

Confirm
  • Forgot password?
    Sign Up
  • Confirm
    Sign In
Creat membership Creat membership
Sign in

Forgot password?

Confirm
  • Forgot password?
    Sign Up
  • Confirm
    Sign In
Collection
For ¥0.57 per day, unlimited downloads CREATE MEMBERSHIP Download

toTop

If you have any feedback, Please follow the official account to submit feedback.

Turn on your phone and scan

home > search >

Quantification of condensation model uncertainty based on large scale PCS test SCOPE

Author:
Zhangli Wang  Benxue Hu  Guodong Wang  Zhe Wang  Ping Yang  Xin Liu  


Journal:
Annals of Nuclear Energy


Issue Date:
2018


Abstract(summary):

Highlights • Model calibration method for BEPU was developed with optimization method. • Nonparametric statistics method with Wilks was used for Sherwood uncertainties. • SCOPE test data was applied to calibrate condensation model. Abstract Quantification of model input uncertainties is very important to development of Best-estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) accident analysis method. In particular, condensation model uncertainty on the Sherwood number should be quantified accurately in the development of containment response BEPU analysis method. In this paper, Sobol’s total indices were used to assess the parameter sensitivity, nonparametric statistics method with Wilks correlation was used to quantify the Sherwood number uncertainties, and calibration intervals of the condensation factor were obtained with an optimization method. The objective of the optimization was to ensure that the Sherwood number uncertainties quantified from test data were enveloped by those calculated from model prediction. The optimization process was automatically implemented with specified objective function and constraint condition. The results show that the developed method is able to reasonably determine the condensation model calibration interval. The method presents high accurateness, robustness and flexibility and could be conveniently applied to model uncertainty quantification based on separate effects tests and simple integral effect tests.


Page:
869-869


VIEW PDF

The preview is over

If you wish to continue, please create your membership or download this.

Create Membership

Similar Literature

Submit Feedback

This function is a member function, members do not limit the number of downloads