Creat membership Creat membership
Sign in

Forgot password?

Confirm
  • Forgot password?
    Sign Up
  • Confirm
    Sign In
Creat membership Creat membership
Sign in

Forgot password?

Confirm
  • Forgot password?
    Sign Up
  • Confirm
    Sign In
Collection
For ¥0.57 per day, unlimited downloads CREATE MEMBERSHIP Download

toTop

If you have any feedback, Please follow the official account to submit feedback.

Turn on your phone and scan

home > search >

The mantle and crustal evolution of two garnet peridotite suites from the Western Gneiss Region, Norwegian Caledonides: An isotopic investigation

Author:
H.K. Brueckner   D.A. Carswell   W.L. Griffin   L.G. Medaris Jr.   H.L.M. Van Roermund   S.J. Cuthbert  


Journal:
Lithos


Issue Date:
2010


Abstract(summary):

A compilation of published and unpublished geochronological and isotopic data from garnet-bearing orogenic peridotites in the HP/UHP Western Gneiss Region (WGR) of the Norwegian Caledonides indicate a common origin for all WGR peridotites, followed by different, though related, Proterozoic and Phanerozoic histories for those in the northwestern WGR (NW peridotites) compared to those in the central and western WGR (CW peridotites). All peridotites are refractory fragments of the subcontinental lithosphere generated by Archean melt extraction, which produced strongly depleted dunites and harzburgites with relict orthopyroxene and majoritic garnet megacrysts (M1NW) within the NW peridotites. The Archean history is preserved by Re–Os sulfide and whole-rock ages from several WGR bodies and by Sm–Nd ages from the M1NW megacrysts. Subsequently the CW peridotites were re-fertilized within the lithospheric mantle by mid-Proterozoic or older silicate melts that generated M2CW garnet pyroxenites and adjacent garnet peridotites. Clinopyroxenes from these bodies show large variation in 143Nd/144Nd, but nearly constant 87Sr/86Sr, suggesting autometasomatism of depleted mantle by LREE-enriched, Rb-poor melts derived from equally depleted mantle. NW peridotites lack mid-Proterozoic garnet pyroxenite intrusions, but M2NW garnet-rich assemblages that exsolved from relict M1 megacrysts may have equilibrated at the same time as the M2CW refertilization. Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf mineral apparent isochron ages from both suites range from 1.75 to ca. 0.87 Ga. The age spectrum suggests continuous diffusion among M2 minerals that formed ≥ 1.75 Ga ago punctuated by partial re-equilibration during a 1.0 Ga thermal event. Much later the NW peridotites were transferred from the mantle wedge into the crust as the WGR was subducted into the mantle during the ca 400 Ma Scandian Orogeny. Further subduction heterogeneously metasomatized and recrystallized the NW peridotites to form M3NW garnet, clinopyroxene and, where metasomatism was pervasive, new M3NW radiogenic (87Sr/86Sr > 0.715), LIL-enriched minerals (phlogopite, amphibole) and microdiamond consistent with invasion by hydrous fluids from the enclosing Proterozoic gneisses. Nine young apparent ages (672 to 424 Ma), all from exsolved or recrystallized garnets within NW peridotites, represent mixed (M2NW and M3NW) apparent ages. The three youngest ages (weighted mean of 429.5 ± 3.1 Ma; 2σ) may date M3NW prograde re-equilibration during earliest Scandian subduction. The CW peridotites show no evidence of prograde M3 re-equilibration, suggesting derivation from a different part of the Laurentian mantle wedge during the exhumation of the WGR from the mantle.


Page:
1-19


VIEW PDF

The preview is over

If you wish to continue, please create your membership or download this.

Create Membership

Similar Literature

Submit Feedback

This function is a member function, members do not limit the number of downloads